Stride Athletics

MAE Final Exam — Results

FINAL EXAM

George Hughes

Distinction

38/40

95%

What happened to Stride after 18 months

A dimension-by-dimension review of where the advertising management went right — and where it didn't.

Budget & investment

Strength

Stride maintained a positive ESOV position, keeping spend ahead of market share to support long-term growth. The budget commitment signalled confidence to the market.

Creative quality

Strength

The creative work was emotionally resonant and met the standard for creative effectiveness. Stride leaned into System 1 thinking — building memory structures, triggering associations — and the craft investment showed in the results.

Campaign deployment

Strength

The campaign ran long enough and broadly enough to do real work. Reach was prioritised over excessive frequency, the channels were chosen for attention quality, and the brand's distinctive assets were consistently deployed to build recognition.

Strategic diagnosis

Strength

The strategic framing was accurate from the start. Stride correctly identified that the brand's challenge was primarily one of mental availability — not loyalty or conversion — and oriented the strategy accordingly. The right mental model drove better decisions downstream.

Long-term thinking

Strength

The decisions showed an understanding that advertising effectiveness compounds over time. Consistency was valued, penetration was prioritised over loyalty, and the brand resisted the temptation to cut brand investment during lean periods. That patience paid off.

Overall, Stride's marketing was managed with a strong grasp of advertising effectiveness principles. The brand invested adequately, applied creative quality, deployed consistently, diagnosed the situation correctly, and thought beyond the next quarter. These are the behaviours that produce compounding returns — and the 18-month results show it.

Stride's 18-month outcomes

Revenue

$620M→$737M

+18.9%

Market share

4.2%→6.3%

+2.1pp

Profit margin

—→+7.5pp

+7.5pp

Brand awareness

18.0%

↓

31.5%

Consideration

11.0%

↓

20.6%

Conversion rate

1.40%

↓

2.53%

How your decisions affected outcomes

Budget & investment95%
Creative quality97%
Campaign deployment97%
Strategic understanding96%
Long-term thinking95%

Questions you got wrong

Question 13

The Extraordinary Cost of Dull study found that dull advertising requires significantly more spend to match the results of non-dull work. Approximately how much more spend does very dull work require?

Your answer

About 2x more — dull work is roughly half as efficient as engaging creative

Correct answer

About 4x more — dull creative requires around four times the media investment to achieve the same effect

Question 39

The CEO asks you to forecast what Stride's market share will look like over the next three years if you apply all the evidence-based principles consistently. Based on what the evidence tells us about how advertising effects accumulate, which forecast is most accurate?

Your answer

Linear, predictable growth at a consistent rate each year as long as spend levels are maintained

Correct answer

Modest early returns that compound and accelerate over time as familiarity builds and the creative platform wears in

Modules to revisit

Full score by module

Module 1: The Dawn of Evidence-Based Advertising2/2
Module 2: Advertising Spend2/2
Module 3: Mental Availability3/3
Module 4: The Power of Emotion3/3
Module 5: The Case for Creativity2/3
Module 6: Distinctiveness2/2
Module 7: Creative Commitment3/3
Module 9: The Wrong Mental Model3/3
Module 10: Two Types of Advertising2/2
Module 11: Familiarity & Future Demand4/4
Module 12: Emotional Creativity2/2
Module 13: Reach & Future Demand2/2
Module 14: Consistency & Future Demand5/6
Module 15: Getting the Balance Right3/3